Procedures need transparancy to work. Especially when it concerns (peer) review people need to have clear view on the elements and aspects of the process. I recently discovered the Center for Scientific review, where I found a nice list of review documents, fee available for all.
At last I started today…
December 27, 2005 — Wilfred MijnhardtThis is what I had in mind for a long time; my personal blog where I can share my professional related personal thoughts and insights with others outthere. This is an exiting moment for me and I hope the content of this weblog will be of use for other people in related positions and settings.
Recently added to ISSUU- ERIM events
- Testing the Efficiency of the Commercial Real Estate Market: Evidence from the 2007-2009 Financial November 30, 2009
- Power Battles and the Emergence of New Industries: The Case of Mobile Payment Services November 30, 2009
- Does the Early Exercise Premium Contain Information about Future Underlying Returns? December 1, 2009
- The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: Recognizing Cognitive Constraints and Curvilinear Relationships December 2, 2009
- Corporate Social Performance: From Output Measurement to Impact Measurement December 2, 2009
- Information Markets, Analysts and Comovement in Stock Returns December 3, 2009
- Strategies of the Big 4 Auditors to Gain Market Share in a Highly Competitive Setting December 3, 2009
- How Incumbent Retailers React and How This Affects Their Sales Outcomes December 4, 2009
- Writing History for the Business Man: The development of business history between 'old' and 'new' production of knowledge December 7, 2009
- Netspar: Supporting Consumer Pension Decision Making Online December 8, 2009
